These reviewers also find that using the touch screen (such as on a Paperwhite) to flip pages is less immersive and can lead to more errors it’s easier to accidentally brush the screen with a fingertip while reading than to accidentally press a button. Fans of the Oasis say that reading with the buttons is more immersive, since page-turning requires such a tiny movement, and that the buttons offer pleasant feedback (a quiet click) when pressed. The buttons can also be programmed for which one is the forward page button and which is back. The Oasis’s screen automatically adjusts to how you hold it, so you can push the buttons with your thumb whether it’s in your left or right hand. Some readers find the switch from buttons to swiping to change pages to be a big step down. The original few generations of Kindle came with physical buttons to press to turn pages, but they were phased out. Paperwhite is the Oasis’s page turn buttons. The biggest factor besides price when considering the Oasis vs. Some Amazon reviewers find that the aluminum case feels more solid and high-quality, while others said it’s slippery to grip and takes on the temperature around it - warm in the summer and cold to the touch in the winter.
The Oasis was designed as a luxury option for ereaders, so it has an aluminum case with a glass screen while the Paperwhite has a plastic case and screen. 6.41 ounces) because the Oasis is thinner. If you have smaller hands and want to be able to hold your ereader in one hand, the Paperwhite will likely fit this requirement better.ĭespite the wider appearance and slightly larger screen, the Kindle Oasis vs Paperwhite are about the same weight (6.6 ounces vs. Some Amazon reviewers still find it easy to hold in one hand, but others found it difficult to grip like that.
The Oasis also has page turn buttons on one side, so it is wider.
The Kindle Oasis has a 7-inch screen, and the newest Paperwhite has a 6.8-inch screen.
Paperwhite in terms of size are pretty similar, though they have some key differences in design.
0 kommentar(er)
